Next: Discussion
Up: System Evaluation
Previous: Local Desktop Client:
The results for the test cases run on Platform A and B are shown in
Table 1 and
2 respectively.
Table 1:
Timing Results in Seconds for Experiments on Platform A
proc.: |
1 |
1 + 1 |
2 + 1 |
4 + 1 |
8 + 1 |
16 + 1 |
Load Op.: |
41.00 |
16.63 |
8.64 |
4.20 |
2.17 |
1.09 |
Timeline: |
0.35 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
Profile: |
2.05 |
0.24 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sequential Vampir
|
Table 2:
Timing Results in Seconds for Experiments on Platform B
proc.: |
1 |
1 + 1 |
2 + 1 |
4 + 1 |
8 + 1 |
16 + 1 |
Load Op.: |
208.00 |
91.50 |
43.45 |
21.26 |
10.44 |
5.20 |
Timeline: |
1.05 |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.15 |
0.16 |
Profile: |
7.86 |
0.82 |
0.44 |
0.25 |
0.16 |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sequential Vampir
|
Figures 4 and
5, show the speedups derived from these
timing results.
Figure 4:
Speedups for the Parallel Analysis Server on Platform A
![\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig_evaluation_speedups-cluster}](img10.png) |
Figure 5:
Speedups for the Parallel Analysis Server on Platform B
![\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig_evaluation_speedups-o3k}](img11.png) |
Next: Discussion
Up: System Evaluation
Previous: Local Desktop Client:
2003-10-06